As blistering heat threatens workers’ lives, states step up to mandate protections

As blistering heat threatens workers’ lives, states step up to mandate protections


As the summer of 2022 sees historic spikes and waves of extreme heat, it’s clear that climate change has altered our world and put lives in danger. No one knows this more intimately than outdoor workers, who face unrelenting conditions: sun, heat, drought, humidity, winds, and more. Exposure to high temperatures alone kills dozens of people on the job every year. Each death is a tragedy. And each one is preventable.

The solutions are so simple: water, shade, rest breaks, and acclimatization.

And yet: Employers often refuse to make accommodations. And they don’t have to. We still don’t have a federal heat standard in place. (While Biden administration called on the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to create a heat standard, it likely will take years to develop one.)

So how do workers achieve protections in a climate that is already dangerous, and growing more hazardous each year?

They turn to statehouses. So far, three states have passed laws that mandate appropriate protections for outdoor workers: California, Oregon, and Washington. (Minnesota has rules that apply only to indoor workers; Colorado has rules that apply only to farmworkers. For more on state labor policies in 2022, please visit the Oxfam Best States to Work interactive map.)

But to be clear: these legislatures did not compose and pass these laws on their own. In fact, each policy came into law because workers and advocates spent years pushing that rock up a hill.

To learn more about the people who dedicated themselves to the new rules in California, we talked to farmworkers and staff at the United Farm Workers (UFW) about their work to demand protections for outdoor workers. A fight that has not ended, as they continue to demand rights and improvements for millions of farmworkers in the state.

Uniting to raise the voices of workers and families: “Luchar junto para no tener miedo”

In 2005, a scorching three-week heat wave took the lives of at least four farmworkers in central California. One of these was Constantino Cruz, who was laboring in a tomato field in 105 degrees, from 6am to 3pm, when he lost consciousness while sorting through the debris and produce. He was flown to a hospital in Bakersfield, but never recovered from brain damage, and was eventually disconnected from life support.

His uncle, Eucario Cruz, remembers that “there was so much heat that day in the fields. He was working for nine hours, with not enough water, and he was working near a machine that pumped out so much more heat.”

Cruz’s family took their pain and outrage to the UFW, hoping to bring their story about this unnecessary death directly to policymakers. “It’s so important to have these protections, so we don’t have more tragedies,” says Eucario. “It’s so simple: shade, water, rest breaks.” He notes that it’s especially problematic for workers who are paid by piece, rather than by hour, as they feel the need to keep going as fast as they can, no matter the temperature.

The brother of Constantino, Emilio Cruz Hernandez, says his family wanted to know: What can we do to make things better? They joined the efforts to go to the state house in Sacramento. “People are afraid to speak out, but we worked with the UFW, we traveled to Sacramento and told them what happened.”

Erika Oropeza Navarrete, 3rd Vice President of the UFW, was deeply engaged in the outreach to legislators, noting how important it was to have workers talk about the reality in the fields.

“We had trucks full of farmworkers making the trip to Sacramento, we did more than 30 actions. When workers told their stories, the lawmakers heard us. While there were different responses, there were often tears… It’s so important for them to hear from workers directly, without it, they don’t have the essence of what is happening, they don’t feel the loss and the pain.”

After months of this effort, California passed the groundbreaking Heat Illness Prevention act in 2005 (later updated in 2015, see box for details). Navarrete says that the law has definitely made a difference: workers know to speak up, employers know the mandates.

“Workers know they need water, shade, rest, they recognize the signs of heat exhaustion – and they’re more likely to report violations (to OSHA).”

The UFW is still pushing for farmworkers’ rights and conditions. In August, farmworkers from across the state marched for days to reach Sacramento to advocate for voting rights.

The union’s advocacy agenda includes protections around sexual harassment, pesticides (which are hazardous for workers and can cause deformities in newborns), quality of water from pesticides, and strengthening rights to organize. Navarrete says the law that mandates overtime for farmworkers, which passed in 2016, was “a huge victory for farmworkers, for the first time in history.”

Emilio agrees that “Things have changed. Before, there was no shade, no water, no bathroom. If you wanted to wash up, the boss would bother you. Now it’s better – they may bother you, but it’s not the same. When people get together, we can fight.”

________________________________________________________

TAKE ACTION:

State level: Reach out to lawmakers to urge them to pass and implement state-level heat standards.

Federal level: Tell your Members of Congress to support the Asunción Valdivia Heat Illness and Fatality Prevention Act of 2022 (H.R. 2193).

More on establishing a heat standard

What is mandated? Why did Oxfam add it to the BSWI? Click here

What is mandated in a heat standard?

Extreme heat has severe, but predictable, impacts on the body; and the measures to prevent exhaustion, illness, and death are clear. The basics: water, shade, rest breaks, and acclimatization.

In California, the mandates for accommodation kick in at 80 degrees.

  • Shade for workers on a rest or meal break, with enough shade to accommodate workers who stay on site during meal periods.
  • Water needs to be supplied free of charge to the workers; and needs to be pure and suitably cool (this is crucial in many areas where pesticide run-off from agriculture has contaminated the ground water.
  • Regular rest breaks, especially when the temperature rises above 90 degrees. Workers should be encouraged to rest in the shade and to drink water.
  • Acclimatization periods for new workers, where employers are required to observe new employees during their first two weeks, and to take appropriate action.

There are further specifics that are helpful (such as ready access to emergency services), but these four points are the most fundamental (and easiest to supply).

For more information on the history of work on the heat standard, please visit this blog.

Why Oxfam added the heat standard to the Best States to Work Index

Since 2018, Oxfam has produced the annual Best States to Work Index (BSWI), which measures labor policies in all 50 states, plus DC and Puerto Rico. This year, the index includes a new data point, which indicates if a state has established heat standard protections.

The reason to add this point (and the urgency to do so) is clear: heat is threatening lives and well-being of millions of workers—most of them in historically marginalized populations, already earning poverty wages and often denied rights to organize. In the last decade, roughly 400 workers have died from heat exposure on the job (likely an underestimate, and not including heat-related illnesses), and yet there are still no federal standards on protections for heat exposure.

It’s up to the states to act, and three have done so: Oregon, Washington, and California have passed laws mandating heat protections for outdoor workers. While Minnesota has created a heat standard, it only applies to indoor workers. Most heat-related incidents occur among outdoor workers; according to OSHA, in 2016, outdoor workers experienced 52.3% of heat-related illness and 79.2% of deaths.

For a stark illustration of how much, and how quickly, the climate is heating up, please refer to the animation on this blog.





Source link

No Comments

Post A Comment